Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Birth control right after having a baby: Why it’s important, why it should be covered

Follow me on Twitter @hricciot

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently put out a new Committee Opinion, “Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.” I counsel all my pregnant patients about the option of immediate postpartum birth control in the form of IUDs and implants, both of which are long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC). The contraceptive implant goes in your arm, and IUD is placed inside your uterus. Immediate postpartum contraception refers to placement of LARC in the period between delivery of a baby and the time a new mother leaves the hospital.

Many women are aware that IUDs and implants are highly effective, safe, and forgettable methods of birth control, including for adolescents. What is less well known is that they are also a convenient and effective option for immediate postpartum contraception. Placing them right after the birth of a baby in the hospital streamlines women’s access to contraception, reduces the hassles of appointments in the weeks and months following birth, and lowers the risk of unintended pregnancy and pregnancies that occur sooner than planned. ACOG has long supported efforts to promote education around, access to, and actual use of LARC. However, this is ACOG’s first clinical opinion specifically dedicated to immediate postpartum LARC.

Unfortunately, in Massachusetts, where I practice, hospitals take a financial loss whenever we provide immediate postpartum LARC, because insurance payments for the birth of a baby are bundled, which means we get one fee regardless of how many services are provided. The device and procedure are covered by most insurers, public and private, in an outpatient clinic, but are not reimbursed in addition to the global fee for delivery of a baby, if provided while the mom is in the hospital for delivery. We need to lead the way with payment reform for immediate postpartum birth control to change this.

While many women may plan to start using birth control at their six-week postpartum checkup, up to 40% of women do not attend a follow-up appointment, and so never obtain a reliable birth control method. But even for women who do go to the routine six-week postpartum follow-up visit, ovulation can occur as early as three weeks after birth and can result in pregnancy. The early days with a new baby are a busy, exhausting, and often stressful time. Having LARC inserted before leaving the hospital takes one thing off the list. There is no worry about scheduling an appointment or getting to the doctor’s office. The one downside is that IUDs placed right after birth are slightly more likely to be expelled compared to those placed at the six-week visit. Yet many women still find that the advantages of insertion before leaving the hospital outweigh the disadvantages.

Access to and effective use of contraception is the critical foundation for empowering women, improving health outcomes, and saving money. Advocating for expansion of immediate postpartum contraception is essential to reduce unintended pregnancy and rapid, repeat pregnancy rates. Several states have changed their insurance reimbursement policies, but Massachusetts is not one of them. Massachusetts is the state that led the way in health care reform, and we need to join other states that are already taking the lead in further improving reproductive health care by adding insurance coverage for immediate postpartum contraception.

The post Birth control right after having a baby: Why it’s important, why it should be covered appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog http://ift.tt/2bS6m2c

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Shining a light on migraine relief

It’s hard to ignore migraine pain. This throbbing headache can last for hours or even days. Although it affects more than 36 million Americans between the ages of 15 and 55, the exact cause of migraines is still largely unknown.

What is a migraine?

Migraines are different than regular headaches. Headaches can cause mild to severe pressure and aching on both sides of your head, and they can last anywhere from 30 minutes to a week. “A normal headache feels like someone put a belt around your head and is pressing on it,” says Dr. Carolyn Bernstein, a neurologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and assistant professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School. “You can usually work through it but they’re pretty annoying.”

The three most common types of headaches are: sinus headaches, cluster headaches, and tension headaches. Of these, tension headaches are the most common and are typically caused by stress, muscle strain, or anxiety.

On the other hand, a migraine is a recurrent, throbbing headache that often affects only one side of the head. In addition to pain behind the eyes or ears, migraines can cause nausea and vomiting, vision problems, and sensitivity to sounds and lights. Experts don’t know precisely what causes migraine, although some migraine sufferers can point to certain things that seem to trigger their migraines. “Family history is a big factor, but people have different sensitivities to different triggers,” says Bernstein. These other triggers can include age, sex, hormonal changes, food, alcohol, and poor sleep.

Migraines and light sensitivity

One of the most common symptoms of a migraine is an increased sensitivity to light, called migraine photophobia. This can be so pronounced that migraine sufferers often need total darkness to deal with the pain.

But a recent study published in the journal Brain: A Journal of Neurology suggests that certain colors of light might not be all bad. Researchers found that while migraine headaches are exacerbated by light in general, green light in particular might not be as disruptive as previously thought.

Throughout the study, researchers flashed different colors of light at people suffering from migraines to test changes in migraine intensity, pain rating, sensory perception, and the spread of the migraine from the original site.

Compared to red, blue, and white lights, green light reduced migraine intensity in more than 20% of patients. It was the only light that reduced pain intensity, while white, blue, and red significantly increased pain ratings and muscle tenderness. Finally, more patients described the migraine spreading beyond its point of origin when they were exposed to blue, amber, and red light compared to white and green light. “The green light was easier for people to tolerate, and some people even felt better after seeing it,” says Bernstein, who led the clinical side of the study. “Not everyone had the same response, but overall there were enough data to show green light was preferred.”

Although green light didn’t do anything to cure the headache, this study does open the door for more research and potential therapies using green light down the road.

How do we treat migraine headaches now?

Right now, green light might not be a viable migraine therapy. For now, medications that treat the symptoms of migraines, including pain and nausea, offer some relief.

However, physicians advise that the best option for treating a migraine is preventing one from occurring in the first place. Avoiding triggers, managing stress, and getting enough sleep are just a few of the steps people can take. But doctors advise that no one should suffer from migraines silently.

“People need to understand that there is treatment for acute migraines,” says Bernstein. “If they are impacting your life it is important to see someone who can specifically treat them.”

The post Shining a light on migraine relief appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog http://ift.tt/2bP2nox

Monday, August 29, 2016

Thomas Pieters Wins Denmark by 1 Stroke

Thomas Pieters won for the third time in the last 365 days on the European Tour, firing a 17-undre 267 to win the Made in Denmark by one stroke over Bradley Dredge of Wales.

Pieters had trailed Dredge by four strokes after two rounds as the Welshman shot an opening 63-66. But Pieters was better down the stretch, going 69-65 to Dredge’s 72-67.

Pieters was awarded 300,000 Race to Dubai points for his effort. He nearly gave the tournament away on Saturday with a double-bogey 7 on No. 4, but only had one bogey the rest of the tournament. He shot the final 32 holes at 9-under.

Race to Dubai Rankings

Danny Willett maintained a slim lead over Henrik Stenson in the latest Race to Dubai standings. Willey has 3,168,940 points to Stenon’s 3,130,447.

Rory McIlroy is third with 2,487,204. No other player has more than 1.8 million points. Pieters’ win in Denmark got him above the 1 million point plateau to 1,060,909. He is 13th in the standings with just a few week to go until the Final Series.

The top 60 players qualify for the Final Series. Currently on the bubble at No. 60 is France’s Alexander Levy with 355,497 points

Share : Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on PinterestShare on LinkedinShare on GooglePlus

The post Thomas Pieters Wins Denmark by 1 Stroke appeared first on GolfBlogger.co.uk - Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More.



from GolfBlogger.co.uk – Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More http://ift.tt/2bvZZkx

Patrick Reed Tops FedEx List; Ranked 9th in World

Barclays winner Patrick Reed vaulted to the top of the 2016 FedEx Cup Season Points List.

Reed has 3,575 points. Jason Day is second with 3,195 and Dustin Johnson is third with 2,907.

Of the initial field of 125 players, only the top 100 qualify for the Deutsche Bank Championship, which begins this Thursday.

Last year’s FedEx Cup champion Jordan Spieth is fifth, but trails Reed by 1,320 points.

Other than Reed, the big jump came courtesy Emiliano Grillo, who rose from 32nd to sixth with his tie for second place. Making an even bigger leap was American Sean O’Hair, who tied Grillo for second.

O’Hair soared from 108th to 15th to make the cut. Among those missing the cut were Shane Lowry, Robert Stretb, Lucas Glover, and Jonas Blixt.

World Rankings

Patrick Reed jumped from 14th ninth in the Official World Golf Rankings after winning The Barclays last week. He pushed Masters champion Danny Willett out of the top 10 for now.

The top five men stayed intact in their spots. Adam Scott moved past Bubba Watson for No. 6. World No. 1 Jason Day retained his spot for the 23rd straight week and 27th overall. The 27 weeks ranked No. 1 pushed him past Jordan Spieth for the 11th most weeks ranked No. 1.

Next up for Day in that category is Vijay Singh, who was spent 32 weeks ranked No. 1. And if Day can just keep it up a while longer, he can catch Tiger Woods at 683 weeks … sometime in 2029.

Share : Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on PinterestShare on LinkedinShare on GooglePlus

The post Patrick Reed Tops FedEx List; Ranked 9th in World appeared first on GolfBlogger.co.uk - Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More.



from GolfBlogger.co.uk – Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More http://ift.tt/2c4sT9M

Patrick Reed Wins The Barclays

American Patrick Reed scored the biggest victory of his career, taking the title at The Barclays on Sunday, the first leg of the FedEx Cup.

The victory also locked Reed into a spot on the US Ryder Cup team. “Everyone’s been talking about the Ryder Cup, been talking about, ‘Oh, you’re in the eighth spot and you’re on the bubble’ and all that,” Reed said after his one-shot victory. “If you go and win, it takes care of everything else. … It takes care of everything.”

In winning, he knocked Rickie Fowler out of that automatic group for the international showdown with only two weeks left to qualify. Fowler had been leading the Barclays but faded late with a bogey on No. 15 and a double-bogey on No. 16.

Fowler is now 0-for-4 in tournaments when he is leading after 54 holes.

The win broke a 55-tournament drought for Reed without a win. He finished 66-68-71-70 – 275 to win $1.53 million and take home 2,000 FedEd Cup points. American Sean O’Hair and Argentina’s Emiliano Grillo finished tied for second, one stroke behind Reed.

O’Hair hasn’t won a PGA Tournament since 2011. Ironically he was in a playoff last year at the Valspar Championship with Jordan Spieth (the winner) and none other than Patrick Reed.

World No. 1 Jason Day finished tied for fourth at 7-under along with former No. 1 Adam Scott.

Fowler fell apart on the back nine Sunday with bogeys on 11 and 15, then a double-bogey on 16. He birdied 17 before another bogey on 18 dropped him to a 74 on the day.

Jordan Spieth, the defending FedEx Champion, finished tied for 10th at 5-under. The post-season series of tournaments continues on September 2-5 as TPC of Boston hosts the Deutsche Bank Championship. Fowler won it a year ago after Day took the Barclays during his ultimately unsuccessful attempt to surpass Spieth in the FedEx Cup Standings.

Share : Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on PinterestShare on LinkedinShare on GooglePlus

The post Patrick Reed Wins The Barclays appeared first on GolfBlogger.co.uk - Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More.



from GolfBlogger.co.uk – Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More http://ift.tt/2byjPIU

An approach to therapy that may make depression treatment more accessible

It makes no difference that effective depression treatments exist if you don’t have access to them. Increasing the availability of behavioral treatments is a key challenge for the field of mental health care. A recent study has just suggested a way to do this. The research was published in The Lancet.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and behavioral activation (BA)

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most researched non-medication treatment for depression. It’s been shown to be effective, yet access to CBT is limited. One reason is that there are not enough well-trained clinicians (usually psychologists, social workers, and psychiatrists) to meet demand. And, training clinicians well is expensive. The upshot is that if you do have access to CBT, it is costly — either to you or your insurance company. Is there an alternative to CBT that could be more available and less costly to the system and individuals?

Researchers at the University of Exeter in Great Britain examined the effectiveness and cost of just such an alternative. It’s called behavioral activation (BA) and its focus is on actions — getting back to doing enjoyable activities as well as those that offer the opportunity to achieve a goal or improve a skill. BA also addresses the avoidance of certain activities (read: procrastination) that, when a person can actually do them, have an upside — for example, meeting new people or trying new activities. CBT involves changing behaviors, too (the “B” part). But, part of the process includes evaluating our thoughts, or cognitions (the “C” part), to see if we’re viewing ourselves, other people, our future, and the world around us accurately. Patients learn to challenge negative thinking — not to fool themselves into thinking everything’s okay, but to look at things more objectively.

A big difference between CBT and BA is that it’s easier to provide BA. Paraprofessionals can offer BA, whereas you need clinicians with more — and therefore more expensive — training to provide CBT.

Comparing behavioral activation and cognitive behavioral therapy

In this study, BA worked equally well as CBT (it was “non-inferior” to CBT), and was 21% less expensive because the providers were less expensive. The good news is that this form of depression treatment works as well as CBT, and is more affordable; therefore it should become available more broadly.

Here’s how the study worked. In just five days, the research team trained junior mental health workers to deliver BA. These workers had no prior training in mental health interventions. They also recruited therapists with extensive training in CBT and gave them a five-day workshop to ensure they would all follow the same CBT approach to depression treatment. (In this study, the CBT approach emphasized the “C” — cognitive therapy.) Investigators went on to ensure that all the providers (BA and CBT) were delivering the therapies correctly.

Study participants included 440 patients with major depressive disorder (that’s a large sample). Half received BA and half received CBT — 67% of the BA and 72% of the CBT patients completed at least eight sessions (a good completion rate). Twelve months after they started treatment, approximately 80% of patients in both groups no longer met the criteria for having major depressive disorder. That’s an encouraging success rate for both forms of therapy.

One caveat about this study was that there wasn’t a “no treatment” comparison group, so we don’t know how many patients would have improved on their own. But what’s especially interesting is that 78% of the participants were taking antidepressant medications and were still depressed before the study. These volunteers also averaged six to seven prior episodes of depression. That suggests that they probably would not have improved much without the BA or CBT.

Overall, this study is exciting because it suggests ways to treat depression that can reach the many people who need treatment but are having trouble getting it.

The post An approach to therapy that may make depression treatment more accessible appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog http://ift.tt/2bv3yY1

Lemon Pancakes by Ree

DSC_5359Do you ever eat pancakes and about halfway through the big, beautiful stack, you get hit with that “blech” feeling? Or heck, that “belch” feeling? (Ha.) Not that the pancakes aren’t delicious…just that you’ve had enough?

Well, there’s something about the addition of lemon—both the zest and the juice—that mitigates that whole blech/belch effect. It just adds a nice citrusy freshness, something lovely and nice that makes you go “Mmmmmm! How lovely and nice!”

Here’s a batch I whipped up yesterday. They were so tasty, light, and fluffy. And can I just say, on another note, how nice it is to be posting a new old-school recipe post this morning! Between my recipe videos and the busy-ness of summer, it’s sure been awhile. Being back in the saddle is a mighty good feeling.

 
DSC_5308First things first: zest a couple o’ lemons. They’ll make your kitchen smell like Heaven, and wait’ll you see what the zest does for the pancakes!

 
DSC_5310Measure a couple of cups of milk…

 
DSC_5311Then slice the zested—also known as nekkid—lemons in half…

 
DSC_5312And squeeze in the juice of 1 1/2 of the lemons.

And I’m just going to say it: I do not know what that tiny hair is on the hinge of the lemon juicer. And I don’t think I want to know.

Actually, if it makes you feel any better, I think I’ve solved the mystery: This lemon juicer resides in the same drawer as my boar’s bristle pastry brushes, and that looks like a little fragment of a boar’s bristle.

Let’s just agree that’s what it is and move on…okay?

Please?

 
DSC_5317Let the lemon juice sit in the milk for a bit while you mix up the dry ingredients: Combine 3 cups of flour with 2 tablespoons baking powder…

 
DSC_53181/4 cup sugar…

 
DSC_5320And 1/4 teaspoon of salt, which had fallen off my pink, pallid hand by the time the camera decided to click.

 
DSC_5322Sift it…

 
DSC_5323Until it’s nice and fluffy and light.

 
DSC_5327Whisk a couple of eggs and have them ready…

 
DSC_5324Melt 1/4 cup of butter…

 
DSC_5328And add a tablespoon of vanilla to the milk/lemon mixture, which by now should be very curdly and buttermilky looking.

 
DSC_5330Now it’s time to mix the batter! Add the milk mixture while stirring gently, stopping when it’s halfway mixed.

 
DSC_5331Add the egg…

 
DSC_5332And stir it a little more.

 
DSC_5333Then add the melted butter…

 
DSC_5335And the zest…

 
DSC_5339And stop when it’s all combined. If it’s overly thick, you can add just a little bit ‘o milk!

 
DSC_5341I like to fry pancakes in an iron skillet over medium heat. Add a couple of tablespoons of butter and melt it until it’s sizzly…

 
DSC_5346Then drop 1/4 cup helpings in the skillet, smearing the surface so that it’s nice and even.

 
DSC_5351Flip them after a couple of minutes, when they’re nice and golden, and let them cook on the other side until golden.

 
DSC_5354Serve ’em with butter and syrup…

 
DSC_5359With another sprinkling of zest!

 
DSC_5362These are A…MA…ZING!

 
DSC_5365Everything that’s lovely about pancakes, but with a definite lemon undertone—just enough for it to cut through all the sweetness and make you feel good about the world. And you can go crazy and use more of a lemon powdered sugar glaze if you’d like this to be more of a dessert…and whipped cream would be nice, too! I won’t tell anyone.

Here’s the handy dandy printable!

 




from Cooking – The Pioneer Woman http://ift.tt/2btUV2M

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Rickie Fowler Leads Barclays Through 54

Rickie Fowler was quiet through the four Majors this year, but has come alive in the PGA post-season.

The young American fired a 3-under 68 to take a 1-stroke lead over fellow American Patrick Reed on Day 3 at The Barclays. His round was simplicity itself: three birdies, 15 parts, and no bogeys. Fowler has not recorded a birdie since No. 9 on Day 1, a span of 45 holes.

Reed fell back with a 71 on Saturday. He struggled with three bogeys in four holes on the front nine.

In hot pursuit two strokes off the lead is Australia’s Adam Scott, who fired a tournament-low 65 on Saturday. Scott eagled the Par 4 No. 1 on Saturday and was 6-under through 12.

Scotland’s Martin Laird and Argentina’s Emiliano Grillo are tied for fourth at 6-under.

World No. 1 Jason Day fell back into a tie for sixth after his second consecutive 70 on Saturday. He had four bogeys and four birdies.

No. 2 Dustin Johnson shot a 67 to rise to a tie for 10th, jumping 29 spots in one day. After a 67 on Friday, Jordan Spieth struggled to a 72 Saturday. He double-bogeyed No. 17 to wind up tied for 16th at 3-under.

 

Share : Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on PinterestShare on LinkedinShare on GooglePlus

The post Rickie Fowler Leads Barclays Through 54 appeared first on GolfBlogger.co.uk - Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More.



from GolfBlogger.co.uk – Golf News, Equipment Reviews, Travel, Betting and More http://ift.tt/2bJh4EZ

Friday, August 26, 2016

Saving lives by prescribing naloxone with opioid painkillers

Opioid drugs help relieve pain by sticking to opioid receptors in the body, which in turn, helps block “pain signals.” The umbrella term “opioids” includes prescription painkillers, such as hydrocodone (in Vicodin) or oxycodone (in Percocet), as well as heroin. These drugs not only ease pain and cause pleasurable feelings, but also can depress breathing — take too much and a person can stop breathing altogether and will die without quick treatment.

Unintentional overdose is now the leading cause of accidental death in the United States. As more Americans are prescribed opioids for chronic pain, these medications increasingly find their way into the community. This has led to a rise in the non-medical use of these drugs.  In 2014, 10.3 million people reported taking prescription opioids that were not prescribed for them, or for reasons other than the condition the medication was intended to treat. As a result, emergency department visits related to the misuse of prescription opioids have tripled, and deaths related to prescription opioids have quadrupled since the early 2000s.

We desperately need ways to prevent these accidental deaths.

What is naloxone?

Naloxone, also called Narcan, is a medication that immediately reverses the effects of opioids in the brain. As a result, it can rescue someone from an overdose instantly. It can be given as a nasal spray or a muscular injection (like an Epi-pen used for severe allergic reactions). Its use among people who use illegal opioids has reduced the number of deaths due to overdose. Anyone with a minimal amount of training can give the naloxone, and it won’t cause harm if given to someone who has not taken opioids. Early on, there were concerns that the availability of naloxone might increase opioid use. That has not turned out to be the case, in part because the drug causes an unpleasant sensation of withdrawal when given to someone who has used opioids. Naloxone programs have proved successful, but they typically are intended for people who use non-prescribed opioids.

Can naloxone help protect people taking prescribed opioids?

But people who use opioids prescribed by their doctors are also at risk of overdose. Is there a role for naloxone serve as a safeguard for these patients?

A recent study in the Annals of Internal Medicine explored the potential benefits of prescribing naloxone along with opioids — an approach called “co-prescribing.” Here’s how it works. Providers educate patients who take opioids for chronic pain about the risks of overdose and teach them how to use naloxone. And then prescribe both drugs at the same time.

In this study, researchers trained staff at six clinics in the San Francisco area on how to co-prescribe opioids and naloxone. They then looked at how often naloxone was actually prescribed, whether co-prescribing translated in fewer emergency department visits related to opioids, and whether the dose of prescribed opioids changed. Here’s what the study found:

  • When providers were trained in this approach, the number of naloxone prescriptions increased. So doctors seemed willing to co-prescribe.
  • Patients who were on higher dosages of opioids or had been to the emergency department in the past year because of opioids were more likely to get prescribed naloxone.
  • Compared to the people who did not receive a naloxone prescription, those who did had 47% fewer emergency department visits per month in the subsequent six months.
  • Receiving naloxone had no effect on the dose of prescribed opioids.

Putting the results into action

The results of this study suggest that naloxone may help curb the potentially devastating risks of opioid misuse — and that doctors are willing to prescribe it along with opioids.

There’s more encouraging news. Co-prescribing seems like a viable option. A relatively brief training for providers was enough to result in a third of patients on opioids for chronic pain receiving a naloxone prescription. The fact that those on higher dosages and with previous ER visits were more likely to get a prescription likely means that providers were particularly willing to co-prescribe to patients they perceived to be at high risk. However, doctors appeared less likely to co-prescribe for their elderly or black patients. Given that overdoses occur among all ages and ethnicities, this is a concern and highlights the need for more uniform protocols to ensure naloxone is made available to all patients at risk. The reduction in emergency visits is particularly interesting and may be due to the positive effects of simply talking explicitly about overdose and medication risks. It could also be because having naloxone on hand meant patients didn’t need to go to the emergency department for an overdose.

Given the relative safety of naloxone and the death toll from opioids across this country, co-prescription of naloxone with opioid pain medication makes a lot of practical sense. Any opportunity to discuss the risks of opioids, how to identify and respond to an overdose, and how to use naloxone is beneficial. These discussions are important not just for patients taking opioids for chronic pain, but also for their friends, family, and community members.

With greater availability of naloxone, anyone can save a life.

The post Saving lives by prescribing naloxone with opioid painkillers appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog http://ift.tt/2bUW1jF

Quad Lock bike mount for iPhone and Android phones – Review

Whilst riding around London, it’s likely you’ve developed your own internal GPS for getting around. But what happens when you want to venture further? Or try completely new routes?

In September I’m planning on riding to Taunton. Following the route will be a lot easier if I have the bike equivalent of a TomTom in front of me.

That’s where the Quad Lock bike mount comes in, along with my Samsung Galaxy.

Having used it for a year now, I feel it’s a good time to share my review.

There are two main versions of the Quad Lock. The first is a case for iPhones with an inbuilt mount. Alternatively, for the non-iPhone crowd, you can get a universal kit. This sticks directly on to your phone or case. I’ve been using the universal version – but the principles are the same for both.

iPhone Quad Lock Bike Mount – £40-£50

This is available for iPhones 5, iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus only (the size on iPhone 6S, 6S Plus is the same so it works on those phones too and likely on the iPhone 7). It comes in a pack with the case for the phone, a ‘poncho’ top case to protect from rain and the male mount for the bike with its attachments. The case itself is pretty sleek and only a little thicker than a normal case. The actual Quad Lock part of it is just a hole in the back so it doesn’t stand out too much.

iPhone case

I don’t have an iPhone so have not tried it out personally, but I have friends who have them and attest to their strength and ease of use. The waterproof cover apparently works pretty well at keeping the worst of the elements off.

Universal mobile phone kit – £25

This is a simpler version and suitable for any phone. You get a sticker version of the female side of the mount and then the attachment for the bike. This is the version that is simplest, cheapest and fits any phone. As I have an Android phone, it is also the version I’ve got.

You can stick the mount directly to your phone, but this would mean that it would always be there. I got a cheap case and stuck it to that so as to be able to use my phone on its own or put it into another case should I wish.

Universal mount on phone case

The main downside of the universal kit is that you have to buy a case and waterproofing for the phone if you want to use it in all weather, all year round. This has not been a problem for me as for the last year I have had a Samsung Galaxy S5 and the phone is waterproof, meaning I don’t have to worry about keeping it dry. I recently spent nearly 6 hours on the bike in the rain with my phone attached using the Quad Lock and it was fine.

Best uses

Obviously the Quad Lock is great for keeping you phone at hand for directions. This was the primary reason I got one in the the first place – I kept getting lost on long, cross London journeys.

Phone mounted on bike

I don’t make so many of these kinds of journeys anymore, and I know a lot of the routes across London, so I don’t use it as frequently. However I have found it very useful for keeping my phone handy for photographs.

Problems?

Generally this is a great product. Its pretty easy to use most of the time, but there have been a couple of occasions when I have struggled to get the phone remounted if I take it off to take a photograph. This is a problem if you are trying to do it while riding along (I was off-road at the time, incase you were wondering!).

Ideally the phone would mount to your stem. If your bike stem is less than 90mm however, it won’t fit. This is the case with my touring bike. I don’t have space on my handlebars all the time, so sometimes I have to put the Quad Lock on the top tube. On the Genesis Flyer the stem is long enough and the mounting pedicle is tall enough to clear the Take-Out basket is have – it works perfectly.

If you do not have an iPhone can can use the ‘poncho’ or a waterproof phone, you probably need to be careful about keeping your phone out in the rain. If you want to use a mount a lot in the winter then there are other options out there that are more dry-bag style and might be better suited.

Review conclusions

The Quad Lock phone bike mount is great. It is simple, easy to use and does what it needs to. It’s useful for photos and directions.

Quad Lock mount top

The Universal kit is good value for those with an existing case such as Otterbox.

Get your own Quad Lock Universal Kit or iPhone kit from Amazon.co.uk with free Prime shipping!

Do you have a Quad Lock bike phone mount? What have your experiences been?

The post Quad Lock bike mount for iPhone and Android phones – Review appeared first on London Cyclist.



from London Cyclist http://ift.tt/2bRUo6x